What can this old Odigo warning story actually tell us?

Separate the narrower report from the stronger conclusion. Contemporary accounts described two Odigo employees in Israel receiving a threatening, vague message before the attacks. That does not by itself show that the sender knew about the specific targets or that the message was a reliable advance warning.

An archived article can help establish what was reported at the time, but it is not independent confirmation of every detail in its headline. Check what the article says the message actually contained, who received it, and whether it points to verifiable records or named officials.

The timing is striking, but timing alone does not establish foreknowledge or a connection to the attacks. I would be cautious with a headline that turns a vague message into a definite warning, especially if the article leaves out the message text or how the claim was checked.