I saw a post linking deaths among scientists across several decades and suggesting they share a cause. It also makes claims about investigations and mental health diagnoses. What would you check before taking that pattern seriously?
How do you check claims about clusters of scientist deaths?
Answers
Start with the individual cases, not the headline. For each one, look for reliable reporting or public records that establish who died, when, what their work actually involved, and what authorities said about the circumstances. Then check whether the supposed investigation is documented by an official announcement or credible reporting. If those basic details are missing, the larger story has very little to stand on.
Reply to this answer
Even a real cluster needs a comparison. “Several people in a specialized field died” can sound striking, but you would need to know the time period, how many people were in the relevant groups, and how the number compares with what might be expected. Cases from different countries and decades should not be treated as one pattern just because they fit a dramatic narrative.
Reply to this answer
Be careful with the mental health wording, too. A claim that someone had an acute episode is not the same as showing how that conclusion was reached. And saying there was no prior history does not, by itself, establish either a suspicious cause or a psychiatric one. Look for specific, attributable evidence rather than confident summaries.
Reply to this answer
Add your answer
Answers are reviewed before publication.
MossyKite:
So a list of names and dates would be a starting point, but not proof that the deaths are connected?