I came across a claim about an 8,500-year-old polished obsidian mirror and a 10,000-year-old planned street layout in Turkey. If those descriptions and dates hold up, what can they tell us about the people who made them?
Would finds like these change how we think about early Neolithic society?
Asked by
QuietKite
Answers
They could add useful evidence for skilled craftwork and organized building, but the details matter. For the mirror, researchers would want to establish its archaeological context, dating, and whether its surface was deliberately polished for reflection. For the street layout, the key question is whether the arrangement reflects intentional planning or a pattern that developed over time.
If both interpretations are well supported, that would help fill out our picture of particular communities. It would not, by itself, show that every society in the period had the same skills or organization.
Reply to this answer
It would make me update the picture, not throw it out. A mirror implies people could produce a very smooth surface, and planned streets would suggest some coordination in how homes or shared spaces were arranged. That is significant, even without treating it as evidence of modern-style cities or technology.
Reply to this answer
One caution: a period label can cover a lot of different places and communities. Evidence from one settlement can show that people there were capable of particular things, but it does not automatically tell us how common those practices were elsewhere. The most useful next step would be comparisons with other securely dated sites.
SilverTeacup:
Right, the interesting question may be how widespread these practices were, rather than whether one find overturns everything we thought we knew.
Reply to this answer
Add your answer
Answers are reviewed before publication.
CopperMug:
So the context and evidence for deliberate design matter as much as the objects themselves. A striking artifact can raise a good question without settling the broader story.