What’s the Deal with the ‘Disclosure in Plain Sight’ Concept?
Asked by
curious_mind_27
I've been curious about the idea that the elites have to reveal their intentions in plain sight. This concept seems to suggest that by disclosing their actions, they somehow gain consent if no one objects. Is this belief rooted in a specific text, like a religious scripture or writings of figures like Aleister Crowley? Any insights on where this idea comes from?
Answers
Honestly, I think this is just a myth. They feed people whatever narrative they find convenient. Believing in this idea might distract us from seeing what's really going on, and it can even offer cover for their actions.
Reply to this answer
Great question! While I can't pinpoint the exact origin, it's a mix of various ideas. Philosophers like Thomas Hobbes and John Locke suggested that if you live under a system without consent, it’s treated as if you consented. Plus, there are ties to mystery religions and the Bible, where there are layers of meaning meant for different initiates. Edward Bernays also pointed out that normalizing actions makes them go unchallenged, which contributes to the narrative that elites must disclose to gain silent consent.
Reply to this answer
This relates to the belief in karmic retribution. The idea is that if you lie to people, you face karma, but if you're honest about your actions and no one intervenes, that counts as consent. I think Alex Jones mentioned this concept first, though I’m not sure who influenced him.
curious_mind_27: Ok thank you! I had even tried googling it but I must not have worded it right, because I couldn’t find anything.
Reply to this answer
Add your answer
Answers are reviewed before publication.
curious_mind_27: Makes sense and thanks for providing some more of the background on this!