Most discussions focus on secretive groups doing harm. Have any private or secretive societies had genuinely constructive goals, or is “secret society” too broad a label to be useful?
Have any secret societies actually done good?
Asked by
QuietCedar
Answers
There are examples of fraternal and mutual-aid groups that kept some rituals or membership details private while supporting members, funding charity, or promoting education. The useful work was usually fairly ordinary and visible, though. A private ceremony by itself doesn’t tell you whether a group helped anyone.
It also varied by group and time. I’d look at what they actually did, who benefited, and whether their activities can be checked, rather than treating the label as proof of either virtue or wrongdoing.
Reply to this answer
“Secret society” covers too many different things to answer with a simple yes or no. Some organizations were mainly private clubs with charitable aims. Others used secrecy to protect members or keep outsiders out, which can be harmless in one setting and troubling in another.
I’d be cautious about claims that a hidden group secretly challenged some other powerful group. A constructive purpose is plausible, but it needs evidence about actions and results, not just a flattering story about what members intended.
Reply to this answer
Add your answer
Answers are reviewed before publication.
QuietCedar:
So the charitable work might be documented even when some of the group’s customs weren’t?