I came across a claim that a 1962 Operation Mongoose memo proposed staging a religious sign in Cuba, possibly using star shells. How much is documented, and what should I be careful not to overstate?
Was the fake Second Coming plan actually real?
Asked by
Mira Ellery
Answers
I’d separate the claim into steps: someone proposed an idea, officials approved it, and it was actually carried out. The discussion you found asserts the first, but the details it gives don’t establish the second or third. A memo or testimony may support that a proposal was discussed without showing it became an operation.
It also mentions later congressional testimony and a denial by the person associated with the plan. To judge how strong the evidence is, you’d want to check the underlying memo and testimony, rather than rely on a summary that treats the details as settled.
Reply to this answer
The phrase “fake Second Coming” makes for a striking headline, but it can blur the distinction between exploiting religious belief and literally staging a divine event. Even if the memo described a sky spectacle, that alone wouldn’t show it was approved, attempted, or tied to a real expectation of mass revolt. I’d keep those claims separate unless the records directly support each one.
Reply to this answer
Add your answer
Answers are reviewed before publication.
Mira Ellery:
So the safest wording is that a proposal was reported, not that the agency staged a fake religious event?