I keep seeing the claim that jet fuel cannot melt steel, so it could not contribute to a building collapse. Is melting the right thing to focus on?
Does steel have to melt for fire to weaken a building?
Answers
No. Melting and weakening are different things. Heated steel can lose strength and stiffness well below its melting point, so a fire does not need to turn beams into liquid metal to affect a structure.
That still does not explain a collapse by itself. The relevant questions include how much structural damage occurred, how heat spread over time, and how the building carried loads as parts were damaged.
Reply to this answer
A demonstration that puts steel in molten metal is a poor model for a building fire. It tests whether intense heat can melt steel, not how localized impact damage and fires might affect connected structural components.
And the fact that damage starts in a limited area does not mean any later failure must stay limited to that area. Loads can shift to other parts of a structure. The specific sequence needs evidence and structural analysis, not just a comparison to a pool of molten metal.
Reply to this answer
Add your answer
Answers are reviewed before publication.