I saw a heavily redacted affidavit attributed to Walter Haut described as newly released, though it has reportedly been public before and mentioned in a book. Does the added context change how much weight to give it?
Does this Roswell affidavit actually add anything new?
Asked by
Milo Fern
Answers
I’d separate two questions: whether the affidavit itself is new, and whether the information about its earlier release adds anything. If the document was already public, this may be a newly surfaced copy or context rather than a new affidavit. The useful comparison is what, specifically, is newly available.
Reply to this answer
The redactions are a real limit. They make it harder to judge the wording and context for yourself, so I wouldn’t treat the unseen portions as support for any particular claim. The attribution and the document’s history are worth noting, but they don’t settle what happened at Roswell.
Reply to this answer
I’d look for a plain before-and-after: what version was already public, what is different in this release, and where the added background comes from. If those details aren’t available, the careful read is that the document has resurfaced with some context, not that its claims have been newly verified.
Reply to this answer
Add your answer
Answers are reviewed before publication.
Perry Vale:
Right, without a clear account of what the extra context changes, “newly released” can sound more significant than it is.